Write a 1-2 paragraph description of your experience and a 1-2 paragraph analysis that connects your experience of capitalism, through this assignment, to the AWOL.
Well I'm going to be completely honest with my experience : i did not win anything and i got to the point where i didn't want to bid on anything. i was bidding on a pair of Frye [brand] boots that are really expensive in stores so i thought id get a pair on eBay . There was only one available in the style/size i wanted so i bid on it. i had a day and a couple hour and i bid twice , once the night of the assignment and once about a couple hours before it ended. i was planning on bidding once again a couple minutes before the auction ended but the price was too high i wasn't willing to pay that much for USED boots so i gave up .
But i did actually have the pleasure of winning a couple years ago with my sister. it was actually 4 years ago when i first [and last time] bid on something on eBay , my sister and i found this really cute bag that's thousands of dollars in stores for not so much on eBay so we bid and won it . When the bag arrived we realized that they gipped us off and that it was fake and we got pretty pissed and never bought from eBay again :(
There are a couple things i can say about our economy from my two experiences. My first experience reminds me of supply and demand and market prices. It also reminds me of competitiveness of the free market . the fact that there was a free market and that anyone can buy and sell on eBay makes it competitive to get the supply. The reason why i didn't get my supply was because of the other people competing for the same thing. In all situations ,there is the one person who is willing to pay alot of money for the supply while theres always someone (me in this case) who isn't willing to pay above market price and gives up. This experience also reminds me of the WAllmart incident that happened on Black Friday. So many people are fighting for things on sale, they will fight for anything that is cheaper then the original price. So in this case , everyone was fighting for about 70$ off a pair of boots,they where competing for it. While at WAllmart the same thing was happening,everyone was fighting for the items on sale that they even trampled and killed a person!
My second experience made me think of the invisible hand and the free market/competition as well. it reminds me of the invisible hand because the people are selling knockoffs of really expensive brands on eBay and making alot of money off of them . this represents the invisible hand because these people are not even thinking , they automatically think of this strategy to make more money and do it. It also connects to canal street,when there are all the fake purse sellers on the street, it is there automatic actions that leads them to sell fake products to make more profit because they know people wont pay thousands of dollars for something. this also connects to free market because since anyone is allowed to sell and buy in this society , these people are allowed to sell fake products over the internet. Which leads to the competiveness of the "fake purse"sellers online,they all try to do better then one another.THis once again leads to canal street,when you walk down the street you have about 20 chinesse people screaming in your ear to buy a "gucci"bag ,etc.They are all fighting for my attention and competing to get the richest family to buy lots of fake bags.
over all eBay is a good representation of the economy all trapped inside of a computer screen.
Monday, December 15, 2008
Thursday, December 11, 2008
part D UPDATED 12/15
1.Given the distinction between a constitutional amendment and a law - if you had the influence how would you amend the constitution?
- If i had the right to change the constitution i don't think i would change anything about it because when you think about it , if there was ANY right you would want to give people or ANY law you could make up to better the country , what would it be? its a pretty hard question because our government has accomplished a lot , and is standing at a good point right now. When you think of America you think that we are falling apart and that we need to do something about , change something, but when i try and think of that one thing to change America, i cant. This relates to in class when Andy asked the students "What's one thing you would change or create to the constitution?" and from what i remember , everyone didn't have an answer. its so hard to create something so serious. Now i had a blurred idea of a law i would like to create , but i don't know how to put it together. It would be something about the poor, making "poor" not exist, making us equal . i just don't know how exactly that could happen , seems impossible :(
something really interesting that actually just happened was that I'm talking to my friend online and i asked her "What would you add to the constitution " and it took her a long time for her to respond and i asked her why is that? and she said well we have everything we need BUT the one think i would change would have to be about homeless people. Which is funny because that's exactly what i said ! This shows that the only problem [us teenagers] think there is left is , homeless people/poor people.
4.What is the general tendency of the Constitution and Amendments in your view - general and steady expansion of human freedom and decency? Reverses and contradictions in no particular direction? Ever increasing betrayal of democratic ideals by corrupt officials? A record of an eternal battle between the evil and good sides of humanity? Explain your fundamental perspective regarding the Constitution and provide a few arguments (including some citations of the Constitution itself) that support your position.
-i would say that the general tendency of the constitution is the fact that through out it all they are trying to make America fair. I feel like the constitution is their last attempt to try and make everyone equal and fair and by doing this they made up a bunch of "law" like articles to it. i would say the biggest example of this would be the Amendments. for example the 13Th amendment stops slavery , the 15Th amendment allowing all colors to vote, and the 19Th amendment allowing woman to vote . these three amendments show that the creators of the constitution where trying to patch up the bad unequal parts about our government and make up these amendments to create peace and equality.
Another conclusion i can make about the constitution is that it does a good job hiding the bad parts of it because until today in class i thought it was all good but then i learned some bad aspects to it, the constitution sure does a good job hiding all the bad parts. For example people tend to speak in our name when its not true . Like when the constitution starts off with "We the People" , it doesn't make sense because WE are the people but are we the people that wrote the constitution and contributed to it? nope! Its also like when we say that WE elected Obama as president, did we underage people vote? nope! its a way of tricking people !
5. How does the Constitution, as amended, create/constrain/shape the American Way of Life?
- i believe that the constitution constructed the way we live overall and that without it America would be like a jungle. Everything would be out of order and without any discipline or structure. the Constitution in one way constructed the AWOL in the way that Americans think of everyone as ONE no matter what color or sex you are, we are all equal . the constitution allowed their to be different parts of the government allowing it to stay organized over the three branches. i think its better that way rather then one ruler ruling all , this way we get more then one opinion before somethings "official". There is one thing though, when i think about the American way of life i think of opportunity , and when you think about it , the constitution is the structure that gave us this opportunity to rise , even though it is failing at the moment , we must be doing something right if the other countries and continents are failing/ were failing way before us?
- If i had the right to change the constitution i don't think i would change anything about it because when you think about it , if there was ANY right you would want to give people or ANY law you could make up to better the country , what would it be? its a pretty hard question because our government has accomplished a lot , and is standing at a good point right now. When you think of America you think that we are falling apart and that we need to do something about , change something, but when i try and think of that one thing to change America, i cant. This relates to in class when Andy asked the students "What's one thing you would change or create to the constitution?" and from what i remember , everyone didn't have an answer. its so hard to create something so serious. Now i had a blurred idea of a law i would like to create , but i don't know how to put it together. It would be something about the poor, making "poor" not exist, making us equal . i just don't know how exactly that could happen , seems impossible :(
something really interesting that actually just happened was that I'm talking to my friend online and i asked her "What would you add to the constitution " and it took her a long time for her to respond and i asked her why is that? and she said well we have everything we need BUT the one think i would change would have to be about homeless people. Which is funny because that's exactly what i said ! This shows that the only problem [us teenagers] think there is left is , homeless people/poor people.
4.What is the general tendency of the Constitution and Amendments in your view - general and steady expansion of human freedom and decency? Reverses and contradictions in no particular direction? Ever increasing betrayal of democratic ideals by corrupt officials? A record of an eternal battle between the evil and good sides of humanity? Explain your fundamental perspective regarding the Constitution and provide a few arguments (including some citations of the Constitution itself) that support your position.
-i would say that the general tendency of the constitution is the fact that through out it all they are trying to make America fair. I feel like the constitution is their last attempt to try and make everyone equal and fair and by doing this they made up a bunch of "law" like articles to it. i would say the biggest example of this would be the Amendments. for example the 13Th amendment stops slavery , the 15Th amendment allowing all colors to vote, and the 19Th amendment allowing woman to vote . these three amendments show that the creators of the constitution where trying to patch up the bad unequal parts about our government and make up these amendments to create peace and equality.
Another conclusion i can make about the constitution is that it does a good job hiding the bad parts of it because until today in class i thought it was all good but then i learned some bad aspects to it, the constitution sure does a good job hiding all the bad parts. For example people tend to speak in our name when its not true . Like when the constitution starts off with "We the People" , it doesn't make sense because WE are the people but are we the people that wrote the constitution and contributed to it? nope! Its also like when we say that WE elected Obama as president, did we underage people vote? nope! its a way of tricking people !
5. How does the Constitution, as amended, create/constrain/shape the American Way of Life?
- i believe that the constitution constructed the way we live overall and that without it America would be like a jungle. Everything would be out of order and without any discipline or structure. the Constitution in one way constructed the AWOL in the way that Americans think of everyone as ONE no matter what color or sex you are, we are all equal . the constitution allowed their to be different parts of the government allowing it to stay organized over the three branches. i think its better that way rather then one ruler ruling all , this way we get more then one opinion before somethings "official". There is one thing though, when i think about the American way of life i think of opportunity , and when you think about it , the constitution is the structure that gave us this opportunity to rise , even though it is failing at the moment , we must be doing something right if the other countries and continents are failing/ were failing way before us?
Part C
Does the 14Th combine with the earlier "no religious test" clause to guarantee a vision of a diverse and equitable society with no government discrimination?
- The fourteenth amendment is a good addition to the amendments because it favored the African Americans. the 14Th amendment allowed African Americans to be part of America and become citizens. it allowed them to be like everyone else and didn't allow segregation to happen. i do believe that it connects to the no religion test because its all about making everyone equal and shouldn't have to go through b.s to be like everyone else. This law was a way to secure the African Americans and to secure others who needed it.
Amendments 12, 13, 14, & 15 are often referred to as a major turning point in US government policy. Explain the importance of these amendments
-i think that these four amendments were such a huge and GOOD change in the US government. Mostly it allowed the African Americas to feel at home and not excluded. its a huge turning point because its when we realized that everyone is equal and that we are all humans, we are all the same, there is no reason to exclude someone because of their skin color. i think that it is such a huge turning point to make slavery illegal because its a turning point for humanity because these things should be recognized as wrong and plain old disgusting to treat a human as an animal. also connects to allowing them vote because once again , we are ONE!
Describe the amendment from the rest of the list (16-27) that you find most significant and make an argument for why we should consider it especially important.
- i would say that the two amendments between 16 and 27 that interest me the most are the 26Th and the 19th amendment. the 26th amendment caught my eye because i think that if you are 18 you should have the right to vote. people may think the opposite but when you think about it , when you are 18 your considered in the working field and a grown up . at that age you should be able to have a say in who your president will be, the person who will control the government. this connects to today and how i am happy my sister got to vote for Obama because when she gets out of college, Obama will be the best thing that can happen to our government because when shes in the working field he will only make it easier for her when it comes to taxes and jobs, etc. so when it comes to the voting age , i say the younger the better because it allows us to choose our future and see how it will be for us . This also all connects to allowing woman to vote [19th amendment] because it now gives us the right to be like everyone else and ever since we were able to work , we should have the right to choose our president!
- The fourteenth amendment is a good addition to the amendments because it favored the African Americans. the 14Th amendment allowed African Americans to be part of America and become citizens. it allowed them to be like everyone else and didn't allow segregation to happen. i do believe that it connects to the no religion test because its all about making everyone equal and shouldn't have to go through b.s to be like everyone else. This law was a way to secure the African Americans and to secure others who needed it.
Amendments 12, 13, 14, & 15 are often referred to as a major turning point in US government policy. Explain the importance of these amendments
-i think that these four amendments were such a huge and GOOD change in the US government. Mostly it allowed the African Americas to feel at home and not excluded. its a huge turning point because its when we realized that everyone is equal and that we are all humans, we are all the same, there is no reason to exclude someone because of their skin color. i think that it is such a huge turning point to make slavery illegal because its a turning point for humanity because these things should be recognized as wrong and plain old disgusting to treat a human as an animal. also connects to allowing them vote because once again , we are ONE!
Describe the amendment from the rest of the list (16-27) that you find most significant and make an argument for why we should consider it especially important.
- i would say that the two amendments between 16 and 27 that interest me the most are the 26Th and the 19th amendment. the 26th amendment caught my eye because i think that if you are 18 you should have the right to vote. people may think the opposite but when you think about it , when you are 18 your considered in the working field and a grown up . at that age you should be able to have a say in who your president will be, the person who will control the government. this connects to today and how i am happy my sister got to vote for Obama because when she gets out of college, Obama will be the best thing that can happen to our government because when shes in the working field he will only make it easier for her when it comes to taxes and jobs, etc. so when it comes to the voting age , i say the younger the better because it allows us to choose our future and see how it will be for us . This also all connects to allowing woman to vote [19th amendment] because it now gives us the right to be like everyone else and ever since we were able to work , we should have the right to choose our president!
Monday, December 8, 2008
Part B
Read and paraphrase the “Full Faith & Credit” provision in Article 4. What does that mean for gay marriage? Explain.
In the 4th article it mentions that each state must give credit to acts that take place in all states. it also allows the congress to make rules and laws that show that these acts are followed.Now you may think that the government would be against gay marriage but this article is in the advantage of gay marriage because it mentions that as long as you have a certificate of marriage you are legally married in all states as long as you have it on you. For example if a gay couple were to marry in California , and then move to Texas, it is legal for them to be married in that state as long as you have your certificate aka your "credit". My opinions on this topic, is that i believe that it is right for the congress to create a rule making all couples to have a certificate of evidence because it allows so many opportunities for people to be married around the united states of America.
Article 7: What was necessary for the ratification of the Constitution? Why “Conventions” not “State Legislatures?” Why 9? Does this seem like a fair process to you? Why or why not?
i believe that it was necessary for the ratification of the Constitution because everyone should have a word in the rules that will control their country . if everything was up to one person , without any approval, their would be rules/laws flying left and right being made. this is why the government is split up into 3 different branches, so that at least a good amount of people have a say in a certain topic. Now I'm not that sure why they choose 9 states to ratify the constitution but i believe that number is unfair because if you are going to give the population a word in this situation you might as well give ALL states a chance. i think that it is unfair they they choose those 9 states. i wonder if the votes would be different if they included all states of the united states of America.
Is the 4Th Amendment contradicted by MTA, library, and/or airport searches?
i agree to a point that we should have the best protection possible , esp. now when there it is so easy to have a terrorist attack anywhere in the city . But some times it gets to a point in the MTA systems that doesn't make sense to me. my friend once told me that after a certain amount of people that walk into the subways , the police table will search you without warrant. but what i don't get is that, what are the chances youll catch the terrorist? i think that the MTA questions this search as well as we all do . i do not believe that the airport contradicts this 4Th amendment because as far as i see it they are doing a great job with protecting us after the 9/11 incident, but before that they probably had a problem with the random searches because they obviously weren't doing their job, they needed a wake up call.
Do “lethal injection” and/or the “electric chair” contradict the 8Th amendment? Why/why not?
The action of lethal injection and the electric chair are going 100% against the 8Th amendment because the 8Th amendment mentions " Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." meaning that those actions should not be required when someone is put in jail , but then they go against these rules and kill people within an instant. i don't get what the point of having these amendments if people and institutions will not follow them. in some ways i do agree with the 8Th amendment and in other i disagree with it , i think that if you are in jail for a life sentence you might as well go in the electric chair , but i don't believe in the fact that the jail makes the decision for you , i think it should be up to the prisoner.
In the 4th article it mentions that each state must give credit to acts that take place in all states. it also allows the congress to make rules and laws that show that these acts are followed.Now you may think that the government would be against gay marriage but this article is in the advantage of gay marriage because it mentions that as long as you have a certificate of marriage you are legally married in all states as long as you have it on you. For example if a gay couple were to marry in California , and then move to Texas, it is legal for them to be married in that state as long as you have your certificate aka your "credit". My opinions on this topic, is that i believe that it is right for the congress to create a rule making all couples to have a certificate of evidence because it allows so many opportunities for people to be married around the united states of America.
Article 7: What was necessary for the ratification of the Constitution? Why “Conventions” not “State Legislatures?” Why 9? Does this seem like a fair process to you? Why or why not?
i believe that it was necessary for the ratification of the Constitution because everyone should have a word in the rules that will control their country . if everything was up to one person , without any approval, their would be rules/laws flying left and right being made. this is why the government is split up into 3 different branches, so that at least a good amount of people have a say in a certain topic. Now I'm not that sure why they choose 9 states to ratify the constitution but i believe that number is unfair because if you are going to give the population a word in this situation you might as well give ALL states a chance. i think that it is unfair they they choose those 9 states. i wonder if the votes would be different if they included all states of the united states of America.
Is the 4Th Amendment contradicted by MTA, library, and/or airport searches?
i agree to a point that we should have the best protection possible , esp. now when there it is so easy to have a terrorist attack anywhere in the city . But some times it gets to a point in the MTA systems that doesn't make sense to me. my friend once told me that after a certain amount of people that walk into the subways , the police table will search you without warrant. but what i don't get is that, what are the chances youll catch the terrorist? i think that the MTA questions this search as well as we all do . i do not believe that the airport contradicts this 4Th amendment because as far as i see it they are doing a great job with protecting us after the 9/11 incident, but before that they probably had a problem with the random searches because they obviously weren't doing their job, they needed a wake up call.
Do “lethal injection” and/or the “electric chair” contradict the 8Th amendment? Why/why not?
The action of lethal injection and the electric chair are going 100% against the 8Th amendment because the 8Th amendment mentions " Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." meaning that those actions should not be required when someone is put in jail , but then they go against these rules and kill people within an instant. i don't get what the point of having these amendments if people and institutions will not follow them. in some ways i do agree with the 8Th amendment and in other i disagree with it , i think that if you are in jail for a life sentence you might as well go in the electric chair , but i don't believe in the fact that the jail makes the decision for you , i think it should be up to the prisoner.
Sunday, December 7, 2008
PART A : Deeper in the constitution
Preamble:
-" We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense , promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this constitution for the Unites States of America."
Paraphrase:
- The people of the United States of America need to do/have these things in order to have a perfect union: have justice (fair/equal), tranquility, protection, promote welfare, and follow the constitution of the United States of America.
What isn't listed? what is a lie or a distortion or spin? Think it through and write down a few ideas, a few skeptical questions.
- as you can see the preamble is all about what one needs to have the "perfect union", well i believe that what they list isn't exactly all that you need. i say this because i think that in order to have a perfect country you need peace , and when you have peace , it doesn't help to have an army . The preamble mentions that you need an army to have protection , but armies only cause war , which causes the opposite of peace. another thing about the constitution i believe isn't what will create a perfect union is the part that mentions justice. i think that if every single person is equal and the same that there wont be competition, everything would be the same, there wouldn't be no "better" because people wouldn't try and get better or create better supplies, i just believe that in order to have a functioning country you have to have competition (not too much though, because then it can get messy). so basically if i were to add a part to the preamble it would defiantly be peace and love, NOT war and hate!
ARTICLES 1-3 of the constitution :
- There are three different branches of the government in order to keep it organized. these three branches are the, executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch.
- The exeutive branch(article 2) is all controlled by the president. the president carries out the laws and recommends new ones. the presidents powers include directing the government, commending the Armed Forces, and dealing with international powers , he/she also is acting as chief law enforcement officer and his weapon is to veto laws!
- the legislative branch(article 2) is controlled by the Congress , which is the house of representative and the senate. What they do is make laws! the powers of the congress is to pass laws, originate spending bills, impeaching officials, declare war, and approve treaties.
-the judicial branch (article 3) is controlled by the supreme court. the powers they withhold are interpreting the constitution, looking over laws, and deciding cases involving states rights.
Questions about the Constitution:
1) what can the congress not do?
2) Who wrote the draft of the constitution?
3) do any of the articals have to do with economics? if so are we going to connect it to our class?
4) what does impeaching officals mean?
5) ARe they still adding on to the constitution?
6) do you believe that one should be born in the USA to become president?why?
7)
-" We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense , promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this constitution for the Unites States of America."
Paraphrase:
- The people of the United States of America need to do/have these things in order to have a perfect union: have justice (fair/equal), tranquility, protection, promote welfare, and follow the constitution of the United States of America.
What isn't listed? what is a lie or a distortion or spin? Think it through and write down a few ideas, a few skeptical questions.
- as you can see the preamble is all about what one needs to have the "perfect union", well i believe that what they list isn't exactly all that you need. i say this because i think that in order to have a perfect country you need peace , and when you have peace , it doesn't help to have an army . The preamble mentions that you need an army to have protection , but armies only cause war , which causes the opposite of peace. another thing about the constitution i believe isn't what will create a perfect union is the part that mentions justice. i think that if every single person is equal and the same that there wont be competition, everything would be the same, there wouldn't be no "better" because people wouldn't try and get better or create better supplies, i just believe that in order to have a functioning country you have to have competition (not too much though, because then it can get messy). so basically if i were to add a part to the preamble it would defiantly be peace and love, NOT war and hate!
ARTICLES 1-3 of the constitution :
- There are three different branches of the government in order to keep it organized. these three branches are the, executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch.
- The exeutive branch(article 2) is all controlled by the president. the president carries out the laws and recommends new ones. the presidents powers include directing the government, commending the Armed Forces, and dealing with international powers , he/she also is acting as chief law enforcement officer and his weapon is to veto laws!
- the legislative branch(article 2) is controlled by the Congress , which is the house of representative and the senate. What they do is make laws! the powers of the congress is to pass laws, originate spending bills, impeaching officials, declare war, and approve treaties.
-the judicial branch (article 3) is controlled by the supreme court. the powers they withhold are interpreting the constitution, looking over laws, and deciding cases involving states rights.
Questions about the Constitution:
1) what can the congress not do?
2) Who wrote the draft of the constitution?
3) do any of the articals have to do with economics? if so are we going to connect it to our class?
4) what does impeaching officals mean?
5) ARe they still adding on to the constitution?
6) do you believe that one should be born in the USA to become president?why?
7)
Monday, December 1, 2008
Thoughts on Thanksgiving/Black Friday '08
well first off i'd like to share my thanksgiving story of how my family started thanksgiving dinner without us,
well first off we went downstairs to play pool and take pictures while we were waiting for dinner to be done,
about an hour later we go upstairs to check if dinner was ready and i see my father putting dishes in the dishwasher,
i start helping him and then my sister says "wait did you guys eat already?", and my dad freaked out and realized that he forgot to call us upstairs to eat ,... so basically we didn't have a thanksgiving dinner:( but its ok because we still ate all the deserts afterwards!
my thoughts on thanksgiving:
i believe that thanksgiving is about being with your family and a day of thinking of what your thankful for. i don't believe that when a family is around the Thanksgiving table , no one is thinking about all the indians that got killed, we are thinking about everything we are thankful for which is ,in my case, family.
my thoughts on black friday:
- i think that it is disgusting how those stampede of shoppers killed a man at the Wall-Mart black friday sale. i disgusts me because its shows that to those families its so important to get their $800 TV or other things. they don't even care if someone dies, they just want their plasma tv. its as if whenever something is on sale, they HAVE to buy it , even if they don't need it, and because of this "random" buy , they killed someone.
-this connects to what someone's theory is : that people find outside sources to make themselves feel better about themselves. i believe that this is true in many ways, i think that alot of people these days will turn to shopping , or their boyfriend, or medication to make them selves feel good about who they are.
-its like every-time they are bored they have to find something to do or watch, i find this way of living a very american way of living!
well first off we went downstairs to play pool and take pictures while we were waiting for dinner to be done,
about an hour later we go upstairs to check if dinner was ready and i see my father putting dishes in the dishwasher,
i start helping him and then my sister says "wait did you guys eat already?", and my dad freaked out and realized that he forgot to call us upstairs to eat ,... so basically we didn't have a thanksgiving dinner:( but its ok because we still ate all the deserts afterwards!
my thoughts on thanksgiving:
i believe that thanksgiving is about being with your family and a day of thinking of what your thankful for. i don't believe that when a family is around the Thanksgiving table , no one is thinking about all the indians that got killed, we are thinking about everything we are thankful for which is ,in my case, family.
my thoughts on black friday:
- i think that it is disgusting how those stampede of shoppers killed a man at the Wall-Mart black friday sale. i disgusts me because its shows that to those families its so important to get their $800 TV or other things. they don't even care if someone dies, they just want their plasma tv. its as if whenever something is on sale, they HAVE to buy it , even if they don't need it, and because of this "random" buy , they killed someone.
-this connects to what someone's theory is : that people find outside sources to make themselves feel better about themselves. i believe that this is true in many ways, i think that alot of people these days will turn to shopping , or their boyfriend, or medication to make them selves feel good about who they are.
-its like every-time they are bored they have to find something to do or watch, i find this way of living a very american way of living!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)